 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2
09-02-2009, 08:39 AM
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, you could use an iSCSI target, rather than an image, and that would be significantly faster... on a (fast) ReadyNAS (e.g. Pro) I get about 4-6MB/s to an image or so (first time through), FW400/800 speeds with iSCSI.
__________________
--Dave Nanian 
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Needed: Time Machine and SuperDuper guidance | kapalama | General | 7 | 08-13-2009 07:55 AM |
| why is my cloning taking so long? | khill5580 | General | 7 | 12-29-2008 01:50 AM |
| How long should preparing take first time? | phileuro | General | 2 | 08-02-2008 09:12 AM |
| SD taking *extremely* long when FileVault volumes are present | jrychter | General | 3 | 07-03-2007 08:42 AM |
| It's taking a long time to clone my drive... | PaulH | General | 6 | 03-02-2005 07:17 PM |
Threaded Mode