#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
I'm now duplicating the tests on my 120 gig drive (40 gig free) which would have no fragmentation at all (since it was just copied over from scratch). Test 1 1. In apple Mail, I renamed a mail folder that has about 5000 messages. 2. Ran super-duper using smart update option. Results: although it slowed down when got to the 5000 files, it still was able to process several hundred files per second (not the 10 or so that I was seeing before). SuperDuper was able to scan 80 gigs (updating about 225mb) in about 9 minutes. No problems here. Test 2 1. In apple Mail, I renamed the mail folder that holds ALL my list mail (about 70,000 files). 2. Ran super-duper using smart update option. Results: slower, but still was able to do things pretty fast (about 24 minutes). So, maybe my original problem was related more to file system fragmentation than anything else? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does SuperDuper have to be running for scheduling to work? | chabig | General | 3 | 12-02-2005 07:19 PM |
Could not disable Ignore Permissions - each time I backup | Tricia Henwood | General | 3 | 08-08-2005 07:57 AM |
server running JAGUAR, client running TIGER...HELP!!!!! | derelict | General | 1 | 06-05-2005 11:51 AM |
Smart update copying all files each time | fabius | General | 15 | 05-29-2005 09:29 PM |
1st backup clone to ext dr estimated time ?? | esuebrown | General | 3 | 07-24-2004 04:31 PM |